NZ Media is a Profit Center

There was once a school of thought the media would report both sides of the story, fair and balanced, well researched, factual, and let the reader decide the balance of the debate for themselves.

Nope that theory went out the window under Rupert Murdoch. Now the media must chase the almighty dollar.  The news broadcast is now a profit center and it must bank huge profits. News that sells is the priority, news that has a long life selling is even better.  Pop corn news has priority over complex matters, as it is easier to sell.

The above failed concept of the Murdoch news presentation is one of the reasons why news via the internet has exploded, well informed bloggers and forum posts attract those that seek out the truth.

The ‘news must sell’ concept has shaped policy in NZders life.

1) MMP: This country should not be run under MMP, as we are too small. MMP runs the country by a thousand committees and the voter never gets what they voted for win or lose. Yet the media wants MMP because is a source for more stories, more squabbles on issues, more rat bag idiot MPs have a say. More stuff to right about.

2) Climate Change: There is no science to say man made climate change is a threat to anyone. Yes there are mathematical models FORECASTING way in the future scary stuff, but no science. A climate change scientist has no better forecasting abilities than your bank funded economist. They have no idea. Yet the media wants this story to run and run and run. As you get great print when matters are grey. Dont believe me remember the Ozone debate that dominated the media for a decade. The ozone repaired it self and the story died.

This is the point: The media doesnt make money when humpty dumpty is sitting on the wall nice and happy, as this is NOT news. They need humpty to fall.  This gives the media news to write about.

Once you understand this, you will agree that the media are whores to almighty dollar and not to the fair and balanced presentation of the news that affect all our lives.

There is no difference between the media, tobacco and alcohol companies, they all feed the public a form of adictive juice that is used to gain profits.

Remember this next time an arguement of MMP and Climate change is presented to you!


NASA data forces global warming re think

NASA scientist were some of the first to get religion on global man made warming alarmism. Now new data suggest that there really is NO FUSS. The earth releases heat into space to moderate its own temperature. The new data suggest that the previously determine loss of the heat to space was calculated as too low in the computer models (ha ha), and the evidence is now that it very very  much higher.

More proof that earth is a living organism that self adjusts.

Source: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole in Global Warming Alarmism

Science has been a whore to the funding

Before you make a judgement on of climate change is man made, you must first examine the balance sheets (funding) of the science departments that proclaim this to be so.

Professors and their departments simple dont get the funding unless they support the view the climate change is man made. We are talking serious bucks here, a professor career is over if he does NOT sync with the political flavor of the University (normaly funded by the Government). Thats it in a nutshell, science is not objectively determined it is pre determined by the funding and resources of the budget allocated to it.

Climate change as been going on for 1000 of years, man has little or nothing to do with it. One volcanic eruption does more to change the climate that man does over a 1000 years.

Quote from Professor Brian J OBrien

…”An Australian professor of physics told him he “completely” supported his concern but had to keep his team of 65 researchers going with work, and “the only funding I can get for them and to get their PhDs is greenhouse funding from Canberra or where ever”….

O’Brien Bio: Australian physicist Professor Brian J O’Brien was closely involved in the Apollo moon missions. Brian O’Brien is a man who has seen and done extraordinary things. He didn’t just teach the NASA astronauts like Buzz Aldrin about upper atoms in space, and what they’d see when they actually reached the moon. He is also responsible for the critical studies into the sticky dust that lies on the moon. This moon dust, caused by the pounding of meteorites, got into just about every part of the Apollo spacecraft. Brian has also been to Antarctica to measure the Aurora Australis, and in his youth managed to survive three days lost and alone in a cave in complete darkness.

This is the ONLY reason why NZ has a carbon trading scheme

This is the only reason why the John Key flip flopped on the ETS.  If you scroll down below you will see John Key statements in Hansard stating that he doesn’t believe in man made climate change.


Thats it, NOTHING TO DO with the fraudulent debate of climate change.

The left wing socialists of the European Union have bullied our fat head prime minister to think that our exports wont find a home in the UK or Europe. He was scared into line. Europe is controlled by an unelected body in Brussels that impose their own Marxist ideas on the fools who live in Europe. Communism has moved from the old Russia to the new Europe.

The supply and demand rule that John Key doesn’t understand, and is scared to let it play out in the world markets.


Not all super markets are run by tree hugging man made climate change idiots, not all countries want to eat and drink poor quality product, if NZ exports are good enough then they will find a buyer.  

John Key should NOT have imposed a NATION WIDE ETS, he should have allowed each individual exporting board or company to handle the ‘Carbon issue’ on their own. After all its just part of the standard negotiations between buyer and seller, is it not !

John Key is a fool, or put it another a Prime Minister that was voted in as National leader but is executing the previous Labor government policies.

Currently National is flying high in the poles, and to do this h must be getting support from Labor voters. The main reason why the poles are so friendly is because Key has failed to be fiscally responsible as he spends up large at $400,000,000 per week on the New Zealand Credit card. These monies are not going to build roads or dams or bridges, these monies are going to pay for life style tax credit policies like : No interest on student loans, funded child care, tax break called working for families.

If we continue to borrow the $400,000,000 per WEEK, then about March 2012 NZ gets into serious pissing off international bankers as our government debt to GDP ratio goes into the RED ZONE. This means serious cost cutting is going to rock NZ society  in 2012. With the NZDUSD up at $0.84, might be time to by US Dollars for wealth protection.

The reader can blame the writer, I voted National at the last election, my next electoral vote will, maybe in Australia ! Ha !

How to get richer than rich, own a FREE market

Ronald Reagan created a FREE energy market by removing the Nixon price controls, the New York Mercantile exchange (NYME) was created to exchange oil and gas commodity contracts. The idea was that a free buy order (bid) would be met by a free sell order (ask).

This setup did not cater for the large volume transaction that was traded as ‘over the counter’ or off the exchange. The NYME oil or gas price was a starting point for price negotiations only (ie a benchmark) . As all large volume transactions are OFF exchange this opened the door to shadow deals to be done. Regulators are unable to audit transaction as both parties are NOT required to disclose the details.

The presence of the NYME gives the illusion that the gas and oil market is a FREE and well regulated market, yet the truth is far from it. How can it be when the largest transactions are completed in secret. No body knows the buyer or seller, the price, the delivery, nothing.

The main reason over the counter transactions (OTC) are happening at all is that if you can control both the buyer and the seller side of the market you have the ideal money making business model. You can control both sides because you have VOLUME on both sides, this means price manipulation can be completed with ease.

In the middle of the USA there are large oil tankers that hold the world largest on land oil supply, some for the US military and US national supplies, yet most is owned by bankers and investors. Nobody knows for sure as its a black hole, as there is no disclosure. When I mean nobody knows for sure, that means you and I, the public, the Super Bankers know all the detail (JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, New York Federal reserve, etc). What this means simply is if a banker invest a large amounts of CASH to short the crude oil market (ie they want it to fall in price), they KNOW they will win as the can materially effect supply by releasing oil stock from the on land oil tankers mentioned above to force prices down, and thus make a huge profit. Remember when oil went from $148 to $30 in 12 months in 2008, yip thats the bankers making huge profits.

The Point Is.

1) It is clear the so called free markets based on futures contracts that do not include all transactions (ie the large volume one) can suffer price manipulation, thus be controlled by large bankers.

2) Its a fantastic money making business model to be able to control both the sell and buy side of a market. This is made possible by the non disclosure of large player positions and the ability to own the underlying commodity in massive quantities for very little money down ( ie 96% leverage). This business model is only available to those that can put up billions ( ie Bankers).

3) The term free market is an illusion for the masses.

4) How can a banker get billions, easy when the Federal Reserve prints money and lends it to you at ZERO percent ( ie TARP, POMO etc)

Don’t believe me, then read this book.


The above I talk about the crude and gas market. It is the same for silver and all the grains. Energy and food are the markets that bankers can build their ultimate business model around, own both the sell and buy side of the market, to give them the power of price manipulation. This is known as GAMING the market, the casino has rigged the deck, the banker wins every play.

QUESTION: What has this got to do with climate change?

ANSWER:  Have you not heard John Key talking about sending our carbon credits to a global exchange to be traded on a FREE market. If you think food and energy markets attracted the price manipulating bankers, then the ultimate market to game would be the ‘Carbon Market’. You had better believe it !

It is all a crock..unless your a banker who can play with billions, then its the ultimate money making business model

New York Federal Reserve ALL EVIL

First  you wont understand this post unless you have read and studied the previous two posts.

Reminder: The New York Fed is a private bank, owned by Rockerfellas, Rothschilds, JP Morgan, etc


This is the book that truly points the finger at the cause of the Financial crises, and the clearly state (one of the reasons not all) that the employees of the New York Fed that went on to work and control the US Federal Reserve and US Treasury and Government, promoted the less regulation is better, and bubble economics, repeal of an important act called Glass Seagal lend to massive leverage the banks and the finally the 2008 crisis. The POINT is all losses from the crisis were SOCIALISED, that means taxpayers paid, while PROFITS made by these banks were not rolled back, the bankster kept their bonuses. There have been no bankster sent to jail, they have a FREE pass to do what the want as the law enforcement are to SCARED to rock the banking world as they may cause a bank to fail or worse NOT fund politicians election campaigns.

The main point is NOTHING CHANGED !  The current Obama Administraton have jailed no bankster crooks, ZIP, none, nada !

COMMENTS: Whats this to do with Climate Change, well its the loading up of debt onto governments that force more control into the hands of the master bankers (Rockerfellas, Rothschilds, JP Morgan, etc).  If they have control they can influence policy, and the nature of taxation on the masses.

If they can do this to the British, German and USA Governments and central banks, they sure as hell can do it to a WORLD GOVERNMENT and a WORLD CENTRAL BANK. In the end they will be all powerful on a world scale. After all USA as fallen!

The USA Federal Reserve Balance Sheet:
June 2007 (before Crisis): $200 Billion (mostly CASH)
June 2011 (after Crisis): $2,500 Billion (mostly JUNK paper from mortgage backed securities) and still growing….

The US Federal Reserve is NOT a US Government department, but the US government is on ticker for this debt.


The Climate Change hidden Game Plan

First a education for the reader

I urge you to watch these videos.

Documentary: The Rothschild’s Exposed 1, 2, 3

The most powerful family in the world most profitable business model is to lend to kings, countries and states that have a controlled tax base, as the debt will always get paid back. The Rockefeller’s have been customers of the Rothschild’s. Birds of a feather flock together. Currently the Central banker of England and the USA has ties and debt owed to the above powerful bankers.

UPDATE(20110528) : The Bank of England, The New York Federal Reserve and the Bundesbank are ALL PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS they are NOT government bodies or created by the law of the land. The Bank of England is part owner of the New York Federal Reserve, the New York Federal reserve is the don (ie most influential) of the USA central banks. You can see from the link that follows that Rothschilds, Rockerfella, JP Morgan Coy are the dons of the banksters.
OwnerShip Reference :

A USA President decided to expose secret societies. JFK took on the ‘new world order’ and lost. Its difficult to tie his assignation to his speech, but his death did remove the exposure:

The Rockefeller view on the current war on terror.
Interview with Aaron Russo. Film maker, politician
Who is he:

The interview on that discusses Aaron meeting with Nick Rockefeller
(10 minutes)
(Hour and half)

If have taken the time to get educated on who will really benefit from a World Government, in short it is the bankers. There are issues forming a world government, how to merge independent countries, how to impose taxation, how to impose the World Governments will.

Question: How do you get people and countries to unite for a common cause such as the creation of a World Government, even when for years they have been opposed to each other? Answer: Create a greater evil that scares all parties. Examples are: War,  War on terror, 9/11, Climate Change, Financial collapse. After all the United Nations was created after World War 2.

Question: How can a World Government generate an income or taxation when it offers no services (i.e. Education, Healthcare, etc)? Answer: The current answer is Climate Change Carbon taxation. A countries carbon debit is sent to a central world body to be distributed to those countries that have carbon credits. The central world body would of course deduct huge fees for its trouble and also impose itself upon those that pay and receive such monies. The Carbon tax system is nothing more than a massive value added tax or GST, it works the same way.

Question: How does the World Government impose its will on a population that doesn’t wish to conform, with out costing a fortune in military operations? Answer: The money is entered with a computer chip for each person (either inserted within the person or not). After all wars destroy or kill a paying tax base.

Some interesting facts that support bankers to lend to the central bankers:
– Socialism is the tool used indebt a nation to foreign banks.
– Entitlement societies are the product of socialistic policies, enslaving the population to the state.
– The need to indebt the population as soon as it reaches working is critical to socialism and enslavement to the state.
– Political systems that require a compromise that will weaken the strong willed popular vote by the masses. MMP does exactly this. Smaller parties overrule the will of large parties to secure the political power, in doing so they effect is a softening down of free market policies.

More Evidence of the few trying to dominate the masses
– Listen to the confessions of an Economic Hitman, if you find the above to hard to believe what can go on.
–  Matt Taibbi : Wall Street Insiders Are Using the Bailout to Stage a Revolution

Chart Attached: This is cashflow of the bankers and the goal of World Government. The bankers have secured and own the USA and UK central banks. The final goal is control over a world central bank. It’s just a natural progression and good business for this mob.

Large Countries do manipulate smaller Countries.

Large Countries do manipulate smaller Countries.

Consider this story: (Confessions of an) Economic Hitman

John Perkins Economist confesses all, he tells us about his career as an Economic Hitman.

..”There are two way to conquer a country by force with armed forces or by debt”..

In 1972 a group of small countries held a massive country to ransom. This was OPEC over the USA.

USA by 1972 was all powerful they had own World War 2, but could not stare down OPEC. In 1972 USA had no leverage over the OPEC countries as the USA was owed nothing by OPEC. Once the crisis was over, the US Treasury walked into John Perkins office (and others), and asked how they can avoid such a crisis ever happening again. The response from the Economists was, we must issue them with debt that is owed to the US. The result is OPEC has the oil, and USA has OPEC debt. A balance of power was addressed, where USA had the advantage as they owned OPEC sovereign debt.

PLEASE WATCH the Economic Hitman videos. Posted on

The first video is most amazing:

John Perkins website is a supporter of climate change of which this site is NOT. This post shows how small countries are manipulated by large countries. More so when the larger country owns your debt.

NZ is borrowing $300 million a week, and has done for 3 years. Foreign bankers own our arse!  This debt is called a ‘mark’, and the mark can be on sold to anyone (large banker, or country) who wants to buy it. Anyone that wants to manipulate the country it belongs too.

It makes you wonder how John Key changed his mind on Climate Change, doesn’t ?

John Key screws National Voters on ETS, Says Don Brash

This is to Prime Minister John Key from Don Brash, read the part about ETS…(NOTE: Loaded the whole letter for context reasons, to show John Key speaks with forked tongue !)

John Key and Nick Smith are NOTHING BUT DIRTY ROTTEN liars..

If you scroll down further, you will see both John and Nicks comments debating ETS for the negative, then they flipped flopped as we all know!

The Blog Author


Don Brash

Rt Hon John Key

Prime Minister

Parliament Buildings


12 May 2011

Dear John

It was with a very heavy heart that I felt obliged to resign my membership of the National Party and to seek the leadership of the ACT Party.

I reached my decision after watching with mounting dismay the performance of your Government.

You made great play of your ambition for New Zealand, and your determination to close the trans-Tasman wage gap and staunch the flow of our best young minds to more successful countries.

Yet you have done almost nothing to fulfill that ambition, and now appear to have given up on that goal.

I have not.

Why are you continuing Labour’s wasteful spending?

In Opposition, we both railed against the Clark Government’s squandering of our people’s hard-earned resources:

 the waiving of interest on student loans, which Bill English rightly called “an election year bribe on an unprecedented scale”

 the way the high marginal tax rates of Working for Families create an incentive



to work harder the exorbitant cost of KiwiSaver subsidies



the unaffordable move from subsidizing doctors’ visits for the poor and chronically ill to subsidizing higher earners’ visits as well.

Yet your Government has done almost nothing to wind back this spending. Two and a half years on, the ratio of government spending to the size of the economy is higher now than it ever was under Labour.

As a result, the Government is borrowing over $300 million a week. That’s $300 added to the debt of every New Zealand family, every week.

That is totally irresponsible.


It’s what Labour voters voted for, not National voters.

Why are you stopping young people from working?

In Opposition, National opposed getting rid of the minimum youth wage. One member, I recall, went so far as to suggest this was the route to communism.

You knew the worldwide pattern, as I did – that most employers will not hire teenagers if they’re forced to pay them the same as adults.

Yet in Government, you actually voted against a bill to bring back youth rates. You deprived another 12,000 young people of the chance to get a foot on the job ladder. Instead of allowing them to work for $10 an hour, you consigned them to the dole for $4.50.

That’s what Labour voters voted for, not National voters.

Why did you change your position so completely on the Emissions Trading Scheme?

In Opposition, we both hammered Labour for seeking to be world leaders in combating greenhouse gas emissions. We argued on behalf of our farmers – the lifeblood of this nation – that instead we should be fast followers.

Yet in Government, you’ve introduced the world’s first all-sectors, all-gases Emissions Trading Scheme, sending farmers the message to turn wealth-generating farm land into idle forests.

That’s what Green voters voted for, not National voters.


Why are you ignoring reality on superannuation?

In Opposition, I argued the crucial need to gradually raise the age of eligibility for New Zealand Superannuation, so that it will still be there when people need it.

Every informed observer agrees with me on this. Many other developed countries, including Australia, have already bitten the bullet and announced plans to raise the age of eligibility.

Yet you have promised to resign as Prime Minister rather than face up to this need to secure New Zealanders’ future.

This is just as irresponsible as Labour’s interest-free student loans or middle-class welfare. You are condemning older workers to a sudden shock, or younger workers to intolerably high taxes.

That’s what New Zealand First voters voted for, not National voters.

Why are you widening, not closing, the trans-Tasman wage gap?

In Opposition, we both expressed grave concern about the widening wage gap between New Zealand and Australia.

You gave an excellent speech just before the 2008 election committing any government which you led to bridging that gap.

After the election, you agreed to set up a Taskforce to advise how best to achieve that goal by 2025. You appointed me as chairman of that Taskforce.

Yet to date, you’ve dismissed virtually every recommendation the Taskforce has made. I’ve asked several times if we could meet and discuss our two reports. Each time you’ve declined to meet me.

From time to time, you’ve reaffirmed your commitment to the goal. But there’s not the slightest sign that you’re taking it seriously.

Now you’ve abolished the Taskforce. And of course, the gap continues to grow.

Nobody voted for that – certainly not National voters.


Why did you abandon National’s commitment to equal citizenship?

In Opposition, successive leaders of the National Party have argued for treating all New Zealanders as equal before the law, and for abolishing separate Maori electorates.

Most of your voters would have assumed that a National Government would take those policies seriously.

Yet in Government, you have:

 retained the privileged position of Maori under various statutes

 ratified the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (which even Helen Clark refused to do)

 created an unelected Maori Advisory Board for Auckland

 created a special Maori advisory committee for the Environmental Protection Authority

 made no moves to abolish separate Maori electorates

 pushed through the Marine and Coastal Area Bill, despite having pledged to pull the Bill if it did not have broad public support – which it certainly did not.

That’s what Maori Party voters voted for – certainly not National voters.

Why are you running New Zealand for our opponents?

And so John, I’m forced to agree with those who say you are not running the country for the benefit of all New Zealanders, but for the former Labour and Green voters who crossed over to you in 2008 for, effectively, a three year trial.

And, of course, for the Maori Party MPs, for whose support you seem prepared to trade away a vast treasure chest of our nation’s coastal mineral wealth.

Needless to say, honouring some of your commitments would have required courage. Reversing Labour’s immoral election bribes would not have been easy. 5

But you have spent the last three years building up probably the greatest reserves of prime ministerial popularity in New Zealand history. What’s the point of cultivating such influence unless you plan to use it to help our country?

And if you won’t use it now, in this time of crisis, when will you?

So many people hold you in high esteem. Surely you should easily be able to convince them of the urgent need for responsible economic management. After all, every New Zealand household is having to tighten its belt at the moment. I’m sure they’d support the need to cut wasteful spending, given that we’ve suffered the worst international economic crisis in three generations and two devastating earthquakes.

To be borrowing more than $300 million every week – most of it from foreign lenders – is unconscionable right now. New Zealand’s total overseas debt is already up there with that of Spain and Portugal, and continues to rise.

The electorate gave you a mandate to reverse the excesses of the Labour Government. You had an international environment which demanded firm action.

With ACT’s five MPs, you had a comfortable majority in Parliament. You could have implemented all your pre-election policies.

And so, with deep regret, I felt I had no alternative than to resign my membership of the National Party.


Don Brash

NZders are so stupid to be paying a ETS tax.

Here is why…

New Zealand’s carbon foot print, if you believe this calculation doesn’t even register.

Your wealth and standard of living is being sucked away from your wallets to send monies over seas for wealth re distribution…just because John Key was intimidated by Northern lefty’s …what a flake !

Who has NO ETS carbon tax
– China
– Russia
– India
– Canada
– Japan

NZ NIWA not immune to FRAUD

ref: New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud

Uh, oh – raw data in New Zealand tells a different story than the “official” one.

Watts Up With That
Thursday, November 26, 2009

Reposted from Investigate magazine’s breaking news forum:

New Zealand’s NIWA accused of CRU-style temperature faking

The New Zealand Government’s chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn’t there.

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain’s CRU climate research centre.

In New Zealand’s case, the figures published on NIWA’s [the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research] website suggest a strong warming trend in New Zealand over the past century:

New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud

The caption to the photo on the NiWA site reads:

From NIWA’s web site — Figure 7: Mean annual temperature over New Zealand, from 1853 to 2008 inclusive, based on between 2 (from 1853) and 7 (from 1908) long-term station records. The blue and red bars show annual differences from the 1971 – 2000 average, the solid black line is a smoothed time series, and the dotted [straight] line is the linear trend over 1909 to 2008 (0.92°C/100 years).

But analysis of the raw climate data from the same temperature stations has just turned up a very different result:

New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud

Gone is the relentless rising temperature trend, and instead there appears to have been a much smaller growth in warming, consistent with the warming up of the planet after the end of the Little Ice Age in 1850.

The revelations are published today in a news alert from The Climate Science Coalition of NZ:

Straight away you can see there’s no slope—either up or down. The temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level—statistically insignificant at 0.06°C per century since 1850.

Putting these two graphs side by side, you can see huge differences. What is going on?

Why does NIWA’s graph show strong warming, but graphing their own raw data looks completely different? Their graph shows warming, but the actual temperature readings show none whatsoever!

Have the readings in the official NIWA graph been adjusted?

It is relatively easy to find out. We compared raw data for each station (from NIWA’s web site) with the adjusted official data, which we obtained from one of Dr Salinger’s colleagues.

Requests for this information from Dr Salinger himself over the years, by different scientists, have long gone unanswered, but now we might discover the truth.

Proof of man-made warming

What did we find? First, the station histories are unremarkable. There are no reasons for any large corrections. But we were astonished to find that strong adjustments have indeed been made.

About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming. All the adjustments increased or even created a warming trend, with only one (Dunedin) going the other way and slightly reducing the original trend.

The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did this.

One station, Hokitika, had its early temperatures reduced by a huge 1.3°C, creating strong warming from a mild cooling, yet there’s no apparent reason for it.

We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.

NIWA claim their official graph reveals a rising trend of 0.92ºC per century, which means (they claim) we warmed more than the rest of the globe, for according to the IPCC, global warming over the 20th century was only about 0.6°C.

NIWA’s David Wratt has told Investigate magazine this afternoon his organization denies faking temperature data and he claims NIWA has a good explanation for adjusting the temperature data upward. Wratt says NIWA is drafting a media response for release later this afternoon which will explain why they altered the raw data.

“Do you agree it might look bad in the wake of the CRU scandal?”

“No, no,” replied Wratt before hitting out at the Climate Science Coalition and accusing them of “misleading” people about the temperature adjustments.

Manipulation of raw data is at the heart of recent claims of corrupt scientific practice in climate science, with CRU’s Phil Jones recently claiming old temperature records collected by his organization were “destroyed” or “lost”, meaning researchers can now only access manipulated data.

John Key 2005 Statements

See Hansard debates at: 

JOHN KEY (National—Helensville) : “I rise on behalf of the National Party to give the good news to the people of New Zealand—that is, the Climate Change Response Amendment Bill is a load of rubbish and the National Party will not be supporting it, for very, very good reasons indeed.”
“Yet here we are down in New Zealand, a very little country with about 0.2 percent of the world’s emissions, putting a self-imposed straitjacket on our businesses, and waving a huge flag that says: “Foreign investment, don’t come anywhere near us. Australia is over there—the West Island. Go over there to pour your dollars in.” To the Chinese we are saying: “Come in and buy as much coal as you like from our West Coast. We’ll sell it to you and you can burn it without a carbon charge—but, by the way, to those back here in Aotearoa New Zealand we will be slapping on a carbon charge and you won’t be able to operate.”

“This is a complete and utter hoax, if I may say so. The impact of the Kyoto Protocol, even if one believes in global warming—and I am somewhat suspicious of it—is that we will see billions and billions of dollars poured into fixing something that we are not even sure is a problem. Even if it is a problem, it will be delayed for about 6 years. Then it will hit the world in 2096 instead of 2102, or something like that. It will not work.”
COMMENTS: Flipper Flopper, barstard !

NZders face a massive hole of debt

Yes yes we do…

13,000,000,000.00 – Thats $13bn..( I think I have the correct number of zero’s)..

AND we are expected by the UN to send approx $50m for the next 10yrs to their GREEN CLIMATE CHANGE FUND…only $500 million..Hey, isnt that a new Star Ship Hospital !

So what if we dont send a dime…what will happen to us,  our exports


Sure we would get several  negative reviews and ‘sticks and stones’ threats from the tree hugging northern academics say that we are not doing our bit to reduce NZ’s share of 0.000001% of the world carbons…so what ! I would rather have a job than be a slave to the nations debt ( or leave NZ of course).

Sure there maybe the odd supermarket that may not buy our apples in France or Germany, but that’s no reason for every to get NZder to get a ETF TAX ! The apples will be sold to someone ! And that folks is JOHN KEYS and NICK SMITH miss calculation. They think it’s smarter to pay $3 billion of middle class wealth fare each and every year (childcare, working for families, Student loans etc).

Quite, can you here that, a socialist has his Green foot in his mouth !

Green World Wide Wealth Distribution

Source: Cuncan Conference

The news is that the world governments will pay into a fund approx $100bn USD to help poor countries battle climate change.

Tax payers from advanced economies paying into a fund controlled by the UN to distribute funds at their GOD GIVEN will to poor third world countries.

What a bloody con !

1) The UN now have a means to TAX every advanced country in the world, and USE GUILT or SHAME if you dont pay your share !

2) The UN is packed with the political left (yes Helen Clark is in there as well) , so if you dont subscribe to their socialist ways do you think you wll get a dime.

3) Once HARD CASH is paid to the a third world country do you think the UN has any chance of policing how its spent. And if they do find any wrong doing do you think they would report it, hell no, they dont want any evidence that their system may fail. Dont believe me, ask where has the $97m gone that was given to Samoa after the Tsunami ??? You can bet if $1 dollar is given to a poor African country, $0.10 will go one climate change to show the cameras and the rest will go on whatever the Dictator or sham government wants it to go on !

The socialist in Greenpeace and George Soros are having a win today !

Your money and freedom is slowly been sucked away from you !

Monies for hosiptals and schools in NZ are beeing filtered off to the UN for their World Government Games !

The affirmative side of Global Climate change is man made is defeated.

All those that signed up for “global climate change is man made’, or ‘global climate change full stop is scarred for life as ‘the easy duped or conned’.

That includes the NZ Govt !

And all those plonkers who signed up at were just manipulated by the very left Greenpeace and IPCC and United Nations.

Do worry we forgive you, not everyone gets in right first time.

Now just repeal the ETS tax thanks, not need any more !

I agree with Nick Smith original quote (before he flipped flopped)

“The madness of the government’s new carbon tax is that New Zealanders will be the only ones in the world paying for it. It will drive up the cost of living and undermine the competitiveness of New Zealand for negligible environmental gain.”


Salinger thesis under attack

Source: Niwa challenged over accuracy of data


The coalition said the New Zealand Temperature Records (NZTR) were the historical base of NIWA’s advice to the Government on issues relating to climate change.

Coalition spokesman Bryan Leyland said many scientists believed although the earth had been warming for 150 years, it had not heated as much as Government archives claimed.

He said the New Zealand Meteorological Service had shown no warming during the past century but Niwa had adjusted its records to show a warming trend of 1degC.

The warming figure was high and almost 50 per cent above the global average, said Mr Leyland.

The coalition said the 1degC warming during the 20th century was based on adjustments taken by Niwa from a 1981 student thesis by then student Jim Salinger, a Niwa employee who was later sacked after talking to the media without permission.

The Salinger thesis was subjective and untested and meteorologists more senior to Dr Salinger did not consider the temperature data should be adjusted, it said.

  COMMENTS:  Would a scientist bend the data to promote their own cause, na that wouldnt happen, or would it ! Fellow NZders your govt is using shoddy data just to TAX you some more !

Kerre WoodHam Nails it ! ETS is a Crock !

Source: Smith’s ETS backflip


ETS is great for those who own trees, transfer of wealth is all for you !

The piece is so good.. I post it in full.

What a red letter day on Thursday! We saw the introduction of the ETS – the scheme that few understand and that no-one believes will save the planet.

Nick Smith’s backflip on this is breathtaking. In 2005 he thundered in what has now become an infamous column: “The madness of the government’s new carbon tax is that New Zealanders will be the only ones in the world paying for it. It will drive up the cost of living and undermine the competitiveness of New Zealand for negligible environmental gain.”

By 2010, the Climate Change Minister had clearly had a road to Damascus experience. “The ETS is the most efficient and least-cost way to bring emissions under control, meet our international obligations and protect New Zealand’s clean, green brand,” he claimed this week.

And the reason he can live with this change of heart without looking in the mirror and seeing a weasel is because Labour wanted a carbon tax that was much more punitive on business. This is an emissions trading scheme which is another thing entirely.

Oh, bollocks. It’s still a tax for a misguided scheme.

And for the Government to claim that without an ETS we jeopardise our export interests is nonsense.

Who are our biggest export markets? Australia. China. Japan. And the US. Not an ETS amongst them.

The Government’s guide to understanding the ETS, which you can find on the web, is also a testimony to obfuscation and spin. It claims most New Zealanders won’t participate directly in the scheme.

Really? I would have thought paying more for just about everything will be a very direct form of participation. The questions posted are the sort of patsy questions junior MPs ask of their ministers in the debating chamber.

What I do want to know is what the repercussions will be for this country if we don’t introduce an ETS until our major trading partners do.

Will the money paid to the Government through the ETS cover the money to be paid to all those with interests in forestry who include the Harvard endowment fund?

The global investment fund of the US university has a big stake in Kaiangaroa Forest and they’ll be tickled pink to think they’re getting such a splendid return.

The ETS is a crock, but National’s gambling on the fact that voters have nowhere else to go except to Act and that may well be a shift to the right too far for most Kiwis.

COMMENTS: I am not stating my politcal views, but I agree 100% with the above. NZders you are being screwed !

ManMade Global Warming Debate Fails

Source: Legal verdict: Manmade global warming science doesn’t withstand scrutiny


…”A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.

The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.”

Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.”…

COMMENTS: If you still believe in man made global warming, either you cant read, or you are just plain stupid !

How competitive is NZ in the world? NOT !

Source: IMD World Competitive Yearbook 2010

Whats the point of this on a climate change site ?

 If you want to invest $1 million or $10 million why do it in NZ, Australia and Malaysia will give you better long term returns.

Part of the reason, is our HIGH TAX society (yes even after the budget 2010).

For example a wage earner does not hit the top tax rate until $110,000 in Aussie, here it $70,000.

NZ ETS must go ahead because..

After hearing this on the radio…

First, we know that the scientific reason for carbon tax is unfounded, and we also know that our main international trading partners do NOT have an ETS (I refer to Aus, US, UK, Asia) so for NZ to have a carbon tax that no one else has is just another large nail in NZ anti competitive coffin.

So what happens if we cancel the ETS tax ?

1) New Zealanders will not get taxed for carbon usages.
2) Those that have been promised cash credits will not get them.

As it just happens, the recent forest deals completed with the Maori tribes are promised cash carbon credits to finance their tree planting plans. If there are no CASH credits from the carbon tax, then there is no finance for the planting, and most likely a bill will be sent to the government for non delivered cash credits.

The government doesn’t want to have another MILLION dollar bill to be paid from the general tax fund as they dont have the money. The idea was the ETS tax would pay the Maori carbon credit bill.

Short story: The ETS is a special tax to pay for a Maori treaty claim !

Bloody Great !

Note: I have no opinion on the rights of Maori to any claim, I do have an opinion on the NZ government reasons for executing a carbon (ETS) tax.

NZders:Take a GOOD LOOK at yourself !

Here you go, this is who you are  NZders, you are ‘Sheep’ soon to be lamb chops !

Get out and fight this ETS rubbish Kiwis !

The govt has just increased your taxes by 5% with this ETS. Bend over and take another govt rogering, or get out and fight it. Call your MP, email, blog, write to the local editor, your freedom is being stolen.

The NZ media are pro ETS and climate change because they are poorly educated liberal idiots. You must do it yourself !

Aussie postpones Carbon Scheme

Source: Rudd does a flip on climate change plans

It reported that Kevin Rud can read the tea leaves. Budgeting for a carbon trading scheme has been halted for at least 3 years. Rud has conceded to opposition popularity that he does NOT have public support for the scheme.

Aussie’s scream louder and make more noise that Kiwi’s, are we just sheep on this side of the Tasman, I guess so.

Our major export competitor and employer of skilled labour has JUST SAID NO to a new tax, that we already have.

Mr Key, how can we catch Aussie economically now? Not a chance.

The kiwi ETS is a joke for our 0.00001% of world carbon emmissons.

Do sheep have any teeth at all…

Plant Science: Saving the planet is a lot of nonsense

Source: Lovelock: ‘We can’t save the planet’ (BBC)

FROM ..Professor James Lovelock, the scientist who developed Gaia theory, has said it is too late to try and save the planet. The man who achieved global fame for his theory that the whole earth is a single organism now believes that we can only hope that the earth will take care of itself in the face of completely unpredictable climate change.


…The planet hasnt warmed this century
…The plant will save it self.
…Science for money cant be believed

…Renewable technology ‘doesn’t really work’

…Trying to save the planet ‘is a lot of nonsense’


Green mad scientist scares NZ Exporters

NZ lamp chops are better than the UK’s produced lamb chops (well lets say).

Q:  BUT how can UK produces price our lamb chops out of the market ?

A: Dream up a carbon charge.

This is what this carbon tax is about, protecting ones home turf. Nothing to do with a bogus global warming charge.

Source: Gases mostly in paddock

Fellow New Zealanders: John key, Nick Smith messed up !


Carbon Trading Schemes: Who has it ?

USA : Nope, not going to get one either GOP wont have it, and Obama lost support since Scott Browns win

Aus : Rud out in the cold on this one. It wont happen.

China:Don’t make me laugh !

UK: Gordon Brown wants it, but he wont be in power long enough.

Europe: Yes that have a scheme, but they are run be lefty’s and a trading partner yes, but not our only one !

NZ: Yes, we have one with a delayed start. With NZ at 0.00001% of carbon issues. John and Nick backed the wrong horse here, foolish jumping the gun policy.

NZders show your disgust !

Send an email to :

King Of Climate Change: Confession!

Source: Climategate’s Phil Jones Confesses to Climate Fraud

By now, Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) should require no introduction, so let’s get right to it. In a BBC Q&A and corresponding interview released Friday, the discredited Climategate conspirator revealed a number of surprising insights into his true climate beliefs, the most shocking of which was that 20th-century global warming may not have been unprecedented. As the entire anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory is predicated on correlation with rising CO2 levels, this first-such confession from an IPCC senior scientist is nothing short of earth-shattering.

Of course, much will be made of Jones’s claim that the refusal to share raw temperature data was partially based on the fact that it “was not well enough organized.” And rightly so, as the very idea that the major datasets CRU released for use in vital anomaly and temperature reconstructions were based on data not “organized” enough to be made public reeks of fraudulent behavior.

Then there are the statements Jones made regarding relatively recent temperature trends which truly boggle the mind.

Imagine a man who has spent the better part of the past 25 years toiling to convince the world of CO2-forced 20th-century warming now admitting that the difference in warming rates for the periods 1860-1880, 1910-40 and 1975-2009 is statistically insignificant. Jones even acceded that there has been no statistically-significant global warming since 1995; that in fact, global temperatures have been trending to the downside since January of 2002, although he denied the statistical significance of the -0.12C per decade decline.


NZder ‘Climate Cheerleader’ Jim Salinger was his work buddie,  in his younger days and also implicated in the hacked email scam !

And also Micheal Mann is deep in this poo as well.

Birds of a feather !

Dont let the facts get in the way..

Source: Smith urges caution with UN report

…”Climate Change Issues Minister Nick Smith has warned New Zealand scientists to take extra care when writing the next United Nations climate change summary to avoid slip-ups like those that have embarrassed their contemporaries overseas.”…

COMMENTS: Are you kidding me ‘slip ups’, more like a monumental f**k up’s of distorting the facts to get one’s desired political results. Nothing will change Nick Smith mind, he has his blinkers on. He does not want to ‘lose face’ and admit climate change is not man made and that there is little man can do to stop it good or bad.

If this was your heart surgeon..

Source: Scientist defends climate report despite slip-ups

…”A report by the United Nations’ expert panel on climate change, which is under fire for the sourcing of its information, has been defended by a New Zealand scientist who contributed.

A claim by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that global warming was melting glaciers in the European Alps, the Andes and Africa was based on a student dissertation and a climbing magazine article, not scientific journal papers, the London Sunday Telegraph said.

Dr Salinger defended the report, saying: “You’ll find that a huge part of the volume is there and just because there’s one or two slip-ups, that doesn’t negate the whole of the article.”….

COMMENTS: Sorry science does not do 1+4  = 6.. If you heart surgeon was this wrong would you go under the knife. Or worse pay huge taxes for falsehoods…

New Ice Age..just like 1970’s

Accuweather’s meteorologist Joe Bastardi has a new video titled Worldwide Cold not Seen Since 70s Ice Age Scare.” Bastardi points out that the frigid conditions affecting significant parts of the world today – North America, Europe, and Asia – are very similar to the patterns in the 1970s, when fears of a new Ice Age were hyped by the media. He repeatedly compares maps of the cold spots from January 1-10, 1977 and current ones and notes the strong similarities…

COMMENTS: ha ha … ha ha

It getting colder NOT warmer !

On record this, On record that..

Check these two alarmist news reports, the media spreading the fear…

Last decade warmest on record – Niwa

Ok so its getting warmer, great things grow in the warmth…

Or this one..

Britain facing one of the coldest winters in 100 years, experts predict

There freezing, worst in 100 years, so what, let me know when its the worst in a 1000 years, now that’s news !

Every weather hick up is to blammed on man made global warming, when the weather being do this for 1000’s of years…without mans help !

Climate Change a UK election issue.

Source: here


UK have their elections next year, and as Gordon Brown is pushing the ‘climate change’ issue, it will visible to all other politicians in the western world that backing a dead horse will see you lose your job.

The UK political full out on the climate change issue will effect the strategies of politicians all around the world. Go the UK voters. It looks like to me the Murdoch papers have drawn a line in the sand, which is for more open free debate on the climate change man made issue.

The man made climate change supporters will fall, along with there doubtful science.

It will never happen..

Source: Climate accord process must change

…”Mr Key said he was more upbeat now about what the summit had achieved than when he left it.

“When we left the conference it was easy to think that we had not achieved a hell of a lot. I think 24 hours on I actually feel there is the makings of a deal there.”

But he said developing countries had to be more realistic in their demands of developed countries.

“Small countries like Bolivia and Sudan can jump up and down and stamp their feet but they are irrelevant when it comes to solving the challenge of climate change.

There would be no credible response to climate change without the United States and China, coupled with Brazil, India, South Africa and the European Union,[BLOG: So why does NZ pay a ETS tax, if they dont !] the PM said.”…

COMMENTS: So what did Copenhagen highlight.

1) A vote for John Key is a vote for Greenpeace.

2) China and India will never agree, and even if they do, they will never act on any CO2 reductions.

3) Obama soon to be ‘dead duck president’ next year (as he will lose control of both houses of congress). Congress will never agree to a cap and trade (ETS) legislation.

4) If the science behind global warming was undisputed by the best minds on the subject an international treaty would be achieved.

5) The science behind man made global warming is a hoax.

6) Al Gore has become a liability for his own argument.

7) Any mass meeting of this nature again will see it torpedo by the new evidence of the hack science behind it (ie whistle blowers releasing damaging emails of the rubbish science behind man made global warming).

8.) The argument of man made global warming is DOOMED, and those that back it will lose. Politicians be warned.


Source: ACT says dump ETS

..”ACT’s Energy spokesman John Boscowan says the Copenhagen Accord agreed yesterday gives New Zealand a chance to go back to the drawing board on climate change issues. He says the ETS loads costs onto exporters, which their competitors in Australia and the United States do not have to deal with.

Mr Boscowan says the simplest thing to do would be to repeal Labour’s Emissions Trading Scheme and start again.”…

TV3 Shameless Idiots…

Source: Summit will not stop rising sea levels

Why reporting one side, as per usual.

1) All they say below may happen as of NATURAL consequence, and nothing to do with man made CO2.
2) Every little earth hick up will be blamed on man made climate warming.

If you don’t believe me, then view the ‘Critical Video’ page on the main menu.

Scary alarmist rubbish..

TV3 shamless one sided rubbish..

…”Efforts to keep temperatures from increasing more than two degrees still will not stop sea waters rising around the globe.

Under today’s deal, small island nations remain under severe threat of being swallowed by the sea and many animal species face extinction.

The Greenland Ice Sheet could start to melt.

The melting of the arctic glaciers would be accelerated.

The West Antarctic ice sheet would be in danger of collapse, melting into the sea.

Up to 10 million people would be affected by coastal flooding each year.

In South East England, thousands of homes could be underwater.

For low-lying islands like the Maldives, it would be devastating.

One estimate predicts between 15 and 40 percent of animal species would face extinction.

Vulnerable regions like the Mediterranean and southern Africa would experience a 20 to 30 percent decrease in water supplies.

African crop yields would drop by as much as ten percent. Millions more would face hunger and malnutrition.


China is looking out for Westerners Freedom!


Thank god for China !

China is saying NO to the world wide lefty and socialist movement to tax you on bad science.  Any tax on you is a reduction of your freedom.

Any monies to the ‘Climate Change Fund’, will just be allocated to purchases of whiskey, guns and whores in undeveloped countries. You have better believe it ! NOT to mention the massive theft by UN and other climate consultants.

So even if the science was good (which it is not), not $1 of NZ taxpayers funds should leave NZ. But ‘I have no back bone’ John Key and ‘lost in the woods’ Nick Smith have already coughed up $135 mil…da !

Source: Obama Snubbed by Chinese Premier at Climate Meeting

UPDATE: Smoke and Mirrors..

…”The U.S. and China have been at an impasse at United Nations-led negotiations in Copenhagen, where 193 countries are struggling to agree on terms for a new accord to cut greenhouse- gas emissions. Obama has proposed a $100 billion-a-year international fund to help poor countries deal with climate change, which is part of today’s accord.

Obama had said China and other major emitters must agree to independent verification of their actions to fight climate change. China has said such a demand is unfair.

The White House official today said industrialized and developing countries have agreed to provide information on implementation of their actions through national communications and analysis under clearly defined guidelines.”..

1) China will not tolerate USA/UN carbon inspectors checking up on them.
2) Obama will not get Congress behind him.
3) The token agreement is NOT legally binding.
4) Smaller developed countries ( ie NZ ) will hand over hard cash when China and USA will not pay a cent.

Just like Kyoto…smoke and mirrors…

Russian Climate data excluded..

Source: Climategate expands – Russians allege data manipulated and excluded to show warming

…”If it is true that Hadley willfully omitted otherwise acceptable data, it would lend empirical evidence to the charges of collusion and data manipulation that have been leveled at the scientists involved in Climategate. Questions already abound over the accuracy of the data used to formulate the manmade climate change theory and many have said the data was cherry-picked and modified at will by scientists. The omission of hundreds of stations that do not show warming could shatter the very basis of the science.”…

COMMENTS: The truth shall set the world free of these cheats.

Unfair Bully Tactics..

Source: NZ hopes to make splash with global plan

Get this ..

John Key is expected to debate and defend NZ position on carbon emissions and our ETS (note: This blog suggest the ETS should be scrapped) at Copenhagen.


The IPCC ‘talking heads’, Al Gore wont debate the ‘man made climate’ issue at the Imperial College of London.

The point is, don’t enter a field of battle if you cant win. The IPCC scientists have got little stupid John Key in a corner to squeeze out a bigger commitment from your back pocket.

UPDATE: Phew lucky escape : Key dumped from BBC Copenhagen debate, but they still got $45 Mil out of him. We are suckers..!

Its about spreading the wealth !

Tony Blair …”To Hell With the Science?! Tony Blair: ‘World must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct’ — Concedes science may not be ‘as certain as its proponents allege”…

COMMENTS: Scary hysteria to get money from your pocket to those that want it. ‘Spreading the wealth’ is the motivation of the liberals and lefties that populate IPCC and ‘red’ that support them.

Source:Copenhagen climate summit: Tony Blair calls on world leaders to ‘get moving’

Chicken Little…Spreading Unfounded Fear.


This sums up the pro climate doom sayers…with no scientific case, not willing to put up or shut up, not willing to debate. Al Gore said ‘the debate is over!’. If you side with that advice you need to re evaluate your decision making process. Science is not a belief system, its a fact system. Facts the can examined by peer review.