How to get richer than rich, own a FREE market

Ronald Reagan created a FREE energy market by removing the Nixon price controls, the New York Mercantile exchange (NYME) was created to exchange oil and gas commodity contracts. The idea was that a free buy order (bid) would be met by a free sell order (ask).

This setup did not cater for the large volume transaction that was traded as ‘over the counter’ or off the exchange. The NYME oil or gas price was a starting point for price negotiations only (ie a benchmark) . As all large volume transactions are OFF exchange this opened the door to shadow deals to be done. Regulators are unable to audit transaction as both parties are NOT required to disclose the details.

The presence of the NYME gives the illusion that the gas and oil market is a FREE and well regulated market, yet the truth is far from it. How can it be when the largest transactions are completed in secret. No body knows the buyer or seller, the price, the delivery, nothing.

The main reason over the counter transactions (OTC) are happening at all is that if you can control both the buyer and the seller side of the market you have the ideal money making business model. You can control both sides because you have VOLUME on both sides, this means price manipulation can be completed with ease.

In the middle of the USA there are large oil tankers that hold the world largest on land oil supply, some for the US military and US national supplies, yet most is owned by bankers and investors. Nobody knows for sure as its a black hole, as there is no disclosure. When I mean nobody knows for sure, that means you and I, the public, the Super Bankers know all the detail (JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, New York Federal reserve, etc). What this means simply is if a banker invest a large amounts of CASH to short the crude oil market (ie they want it to fall in price), they KNOW they will win as the can materially effect supply by releasing oil stock from the on land oil tankers mentioned above to force prices down, and thus make a huge profit. Remember when oil went from $148 to $30 in 12 months in 2008, yip thats the bankers making huge profits.

The Point Is.

1) It is clear the so called free markets based on futures contracts that do not include all transactions (ie the large volume one) can suffer price manipulation, thus be controlled by large bankers.

2) Its a fantastic money making business model to be able to control both the sell and buy side of a market. This is made possible by the non disclosure of large player positions and the ability to own the underlying commodity in massive quantities for very little money down ( ie 96% leverage). This business model is only available to those that can put up billions ( ie Bankers).

3) The term free market is an illusion for the masses.

4) How can a banker get billions, easy when the Federal Reserve prints money and lends it to you at ZERO percent ( ie TARP, POMO etc)

Don’t believe me, then read this book.

                           

The above I talk about the crude and gas market. It is the same for silver and all the grains. Energy and food are the markets that bankers can build their ultimate business model around, own both the sell and buy side of the market, to give them the power of price manipulation. This is known as GAMING the market, the casino has rigged the deck, the banker wins every play.

QUESTION: What has this got to do with climate change?

ANSWER:  Have you not heard John Key talking about sending our carbon credits to a global exchange to be traded on a FREE market. If you think food and energy markets attracted the price manipulating bankers, then the ultimate market to game would be the ‘Carbon Market’. You had better believe it !

It is all a crock..unless your a banker who can play with billions, then its the ultimate money making business model

New York Federal Reserve ALL EVIL

First  you wont understand this post unless you have read and studied the previous two posts.

Reminder: The New York Fed is a private bank, owned by Rockerfellas, Rothschilds, JP Morgan, etc
REF:http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html

                

This is the book that truly points the finger at the cause of the Financial crises, and the clearly state (one of the reasons not all) that the employees of the New York Fed that went on to work and control the US Federal Reserve and US Treasury and Government, promoted the less regulation is better, and bubble economics, repeal of an important act called Glass Seagal lend to massive leverage the banks and the finally the 2008 crisis. The POINT is all losses from the crisis were SOCIALISED, that means taxpayers paid, while PROFITS made by these banks were not rolled back, the bankster kept their bonuses. There have been no bankster sent to jail, they have a FREE pass to do what the want as the law enforcement are to SCARED to rock the banking world as they may cause a bank to fail or worse NOT fund politicians election campaigns.

The main point is NOTHING CHANGED !  The current Obama Administraton have jailed no bankster crooks, ZIP, none, nada !

COMMENTS: Whats this to do with Climate Change, well its the loading up of debt onto governments that force more control into the hands of the master bankers (Rockerfellas, Rothschilds, JP Morgan, etc).  If they have control they can influence policy, and the nature of taxation on the masses.

If they can do this to the British, German and USA Governments and central banks, they sure as hell can do it to a WORLD GOVERNMENT and a WORLD CENTRAL BANK. In the end they will be all powerful on a world scale. After all USA as fallen!

The USA Federal Reserve Balance Sheet:
June 2007 (before Crisis): $200 Billion (mostly CASH)
June 2011 (after Crisis): $2,500 Billion (mostly JUNK paper from mortgage backed securities) and still growing….

The US Federal Reserve is NOT a US Government department, but the US government is on ticker for this debt.

REF: http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/fed-fatal-flaw-morgenson-rosner-why-nothing-changed-123813497.html

The Climate Change hidden Game Plan

First a education for the reader

I urge you to watch these youtube.com videos.

Documentary: The Rothschild’s Exposed 1, 2, 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F4IGwuKdUQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2Yjoi2_5pw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47WM2BhklmM

The most powerful family in the world most profitable business model is to lend to kings, countries and states that have a controlled tax base, as the debt will always get paid back. The Rockefeller’s have been customers of the Rothschild’s. Birds of a feather flock together. Currently the Central banker of England and the USA has ties and debt owed to the above powerful bankers.

UPDATE(20110528) : The Bank of England, The New York Federal Reserve and the Bundesbank are ALL PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS they are NOT government bodies or created by the law of the land. The Bank of England is part owner of the New York Federal Reserve, the New York Federal reserve is the don (ie most influential) of the USA central banks. You can see from the link that follows that Rothschilds, Rockerfella, JP Morgan Coy are the dons of the banksters.
OwnerShip Reference : http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html

A USA President decided to expose secret societies. JFK took on the ‘new world order’ and lost. Its difficult to tie his assignation to his speech, but his death did remove the exposure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR5m1-5ksj0

The Rockefeller view on the current war on terror.
Interview with Aaron Russo. Film maker, politician
Who is he: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Russo

The interview on youtube.com that discusses Aaron meeting with Nick Rockefeller
(10 minutes) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
(Hour and half) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ

If have taken the time to get educated on who will really benefit from a World Government, in short it is the bankers. There are issues forming a world government, how to merge independent countries, how to impose taxation, how to impose the World Governments will.

Question: How do you get people and countries to unite for a common cause such as the creation of a World Government, even when for years they have been opposed to each other? Answer: Create a greater evil that scares all parties. Examples are: War,  War on terror, 9/11, Climate Change, Financial collapse. After all the United Nations was created after World War 2.

Question: How can a World Government generate an income or taxation when it offers no services (i.e. Education, Healthcare, etc)? Answer: The current answer is Climate Change Carbon taxation. A countries carbon debit is sent to a central world body to be distributed to those countries that have carbon credits. The central world body would of course deduct huge fees for its trouble and also impose itself upon those that pay and receive such monies. The Carbon tax system is nothing more than a massive value added tax or GST, it works the same way.

Question: How does the World Government impose its will on a population that doesn’t wish to conform, with out costing a fortune in military operations? Answer: The money is entered with a computer chip for each person (either inserted within the person or not). After all wars destroy or kill a paying tax base.

Some interesting facts that support bankers to lend to the central bankers:
– Socialism is the tool used indebt a nation to foreign banks.
– Entitlement societies are the product of socialistic policies, enslaving the population to the state.
– The need to indebt the population as soon as it reaches working is critical to socialism and enslavement to the state.
– Political systems that require a compromise that will weaken the strong willed popular vote by the masses. MMP does exactly this. Smaller parties overrule the will of large parties to secure the political power, in doing so they effect is a softening down of free market policies.

More Evidence of the few trying to dominate the masses
– Listen to the confessions of an Economic Hitman, if you find the above to hard to believe what can go on.
–  Matt Taibbi : Wall Street Insiders Are Using the Bailout to Stage a Revolution

Chart Attached: This is cashflow of the bankers and the goal of World Government. The bankers have secured and own the USA and UK central banks. The final goal is control over a world central bank. It’s just a natural progression and good business for this mob.



Large Countries do manipulate smaller Countries.

Large Countries do manipulate smaller Countries.

Consider this story: (Confessions of an) Economic Hitman

John Perkins Economist confesses all, he tells us about his career as an Economic Hitman.

..”There are two way to conquer a country by force with armed forces or by debt”..

In 1972 a group of small countries held a massive country to ransom. This was OPEC over the USA.

USA by 1972 was all powerful they had own World War 2, but could not stare down OPEC. In 1972 USA had no leverage over the OPEC countries as the USA was owed nothing by OPEC. Once the crisis was over, the US Treasury walked into John Perkins office (and others), and asked how they can avoid such a crisis ever happening again. The response from the Economists was, we must issue them with debt that is owed to the US. The result is OPEC has the oil, and USA has OPEC debt. A balance of power was addressed, where USA had the advantage as they owned OPEC sovereign debt.

PLEASE WATCH the Economic Hitman videos. Posted on Zerohedge.com.

The first video is most amazing: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/extended-confessions-economic-hit-man

John Perkins website is a supporter of climate change of which this site is NOT. This post shows how small countries are manipulated by large countries. More so when the larger country owns your debt.

NZ is borrowing $300 million a week, and has done for 3 years. Foreign bankers own our arse!  This debt is called a ‘mark’, and the mark can be on sold to anyone (large banker, or country) who wants to buy it. Anyone that wants to manipulate the country it belongs too.

It makes you wonder how John Key changed his mind on Climate Change, doesn’t ?

NZ NIWA not immune to FRAUD

ref: New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud

Uh, oh – raw data in New Zealand tells a different story than the “official” one.

Watts Up With That
Thursday, November 26, 2009

Reposted from TBR.cc Investigate magazine’s breaking news forum:

New Zealand’s NIWA accused of CRU-style temperature faking

The New Zealand Government’s chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn’t there.

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain’s CRU climate research centre.

In New Zealand’s case, the figures published on NIWA’s [the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research] website suggest a strong warming trend in New Zealand over the past century:

New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud

The caption to the photo on the NiWA site reads:

From NIWA’s web site — Figure 7: Mean annual temperature over New Zealand, from 1853 to 2008 inclusive, based on between 2 (from 1853) and 7 (from 1908) long-term station records. The blue and red bars show annual differences from the 1971 – 2000 average, the solid black line is a smoothed time series, and the dotted [straight] line is the linear trend over 1909 to 2008 (0.92°C/100 years).

But analysis of the raw climate data from the same temperature stations has just turned up a very different result:

New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud

Gone is the relentless rising temperature trend, and instead there appears to have been a much smaller growth in warming, consistent with the warming up of the planet after the end of the Little Ice Age in 1850.

The revelations are published today in a news alert from The Climate Science Coalition of NZ:

Straight away you can see there’s no slope—either up or down. The temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level—statistically insignificant at 0.06°C per century since 1850.

Putting these two graphs side by side, you can see huge differences. What is going on?

Why does NIWA’s graph show strong warming, but graphing their own raw data looks completely different? Their graph shows warming, but the actual temperature readings show none whatsoever!

Have the readings in the official NIWA graph been adjusted?

It is relatively easy to find out. We compared raw data for each station (from NIWA’s web site) with the adjusted official data, which we obtained from one of Dr Salinger’s colleagues.

Requests for this information from Dr Salinger himself over the years, by different scientists, have long gone unanswered, but now we might discover the truth.

Proof of man-made warming

What did we find? First, the station histories are unremarkable. There are no reasons for any large corrections. But we were astonished to find that strong adjustments have indeed been made.

About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming. All the adjustments increased or even created a warming trend, with only one (Dunedin) going the other way and slightly reducing the original trend.

The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did this.

One station, Hokitika, had its early temperatures reduced by a huge 1.3°C, creating strong warming from a mild cooling, yet there’s no apparent reason for it.

We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.

NIWA claim their official graph reveals a rising trend of 0.92ºC per century, which means (they claim) we warmed more than the rest of the globe, for according to the IPCC, global warming over the 20th century was only about 0.6°C.

NIWA’s David Wratt has told Investigate magazine this afternoon his organization denies faking temperature data and he claims NIWA has a good explanation for adjusting the temperature data upward. Wratt says NIWA is drafting a media response for release later this afternoon which will explain why they altered the raw data.

“Do you agree it might look bad in the wake of the CRU scandal?”

“No, no,” replied Wratt before hitting out at the Climate Science Coalition and accusing them of “misleading” people about the temperature adjustments.

Manipulation of raw data is at the heart of recent claims of corrupt scientific practice in climate science, with CRU’s Phil Jones recently claiming old temperature records collected by his organization were “destroyed” or “lost”, meaning researchers can now only access manipulated data.

The affirmative side of Global Climate change is man made is defeated.

All those that signed up for “global climate change is man made’, or ‘global climate change full stop is scarred for life as ‘the easy duped or conned’.

That includes the NZ Govt !

And all those plonkers who signed up at http://www.signon.org.nz/ were just manipulated by the very left Greenpeace and IPCC and United Nations.

Do worry we forgive you, not everyone gets in right first time.

Now just repeal the ETS tax thanks, not need any more !

I agree with Nick Smith original quote (before he flipped flopped)

“The madness of the government’s new carbon tax is that New Zealanders will be the only ones in the world paying for it. It will drive up the cost of living and undermine the competitiveness of New Zealand for negligible environmental gain.”

 

Salinger thesis under attack

Source: Niwa challenged over accuracy of data

Extract..

The coalition said the New Zealand Temperature Records (NZTR) were the historical base of NIWA’s advice to the Government on issues relating to climate change.

Coalition spokesman Bryan Leyland said many scientists believed although the earth had been warming for 150 years, it had not heated as much as Government archives claimed.

He said the New Zealand Meteorological Service had shown no warming during the past century but Niwa had adjusted its records to show a warming trend of 1degC.

The warming figure was high and almost 50 per cent above the global average, said Mr Leyland.

The coalition said the 1degC warming during the 20th century was based on adjustments taken by Niwa from a 1981 student thesis by then student Jim Salinger, a Niwa employee who was later sacked after talking to the media without permission.

The Salinger thesis was subjective and untested and meteorologists more senior to Dr Salinger did not consider the temperature data should be adjusted, it said.

  COMMENTS:  Would a scientist bend the data to promote their own cause, na that wouldnt happen, or would it ! Fellow NZders your govt is using shoddy data just to TAX you some more !

Michael Mann Proven Data Manipulator

Who is Michael Man?

He is the fellow behind AL Gore’s hockey stick graph that shows a (a manipulated stretch of the truth) alarming upswing in global warming.

However on a closer look it can be can be concluded that..the current warming trend is not unusual or alarming, nor unique, and certainly not justifiable to spend trillions of world taxpayers dollars on.

Source: Understanding Climategate’s Hidden Decline by Marc Sheppard, AmericanThinker.com

Or get the song version…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk

mann001