Fellow New Zealanders: John key, Nick Smith messed up !

 

Carbon Trading Schemes: Who has it ?

USA : Nope, not going to get one either GOP wont have it, and Obama lost support since Scott Browns win

Aus : Rud out in the cold on this one. It wont happen.

China:Don’t make me laugh !

UK: Gordon Brown wants it, but he wont be in power long enough.

Europe: Yes that have a scheme, but they are run be lefty’s and a trading partner yes, but not our only one !

NZ: Yes, we have one with a delayed start. With NZ at 0.00001% of carbon issues. John and Nick backed the wrong horse here, foolish jumping the gun policy.

NZders show your disgust !

Send an email to : [email protected]

King Of Climate Change: Confession!

Source: Climategate’s Phil Jones Confesses to Climate Fraud

By now, Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) should require no introduction, so let’s get right to it. In a BBC Q&A and corresponding interview released Friday, the discredited Climategate conspirator revealed a number of surprising insights into his true climate beliefs, the most shocking of which was that 20th-century global warming may not have been unprecedented. As the entire anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory is predicated on correlation with rising CO2 levels, this first-such confession from an IPCC senior scientist is nothing short of earth-shattering.

Of course, much will be made of Jones’s claim that the refusal to share raw temperature data was partially based on the fact that it “was not well enough organized.” And rightly so, as the very idea that the major datasets CRU released for use in vital anomaly and temperature reconstructions were based on data not “organized” enough to be made public reeks of fraudulent behavior.

Then there are the statements Jones made regarding relatively recent temperature trends which truly boggle the mind.

Imagine a man who has spent the better part of the past 25 years toiling to convince the world of CO2-forced 20th-century warming now admitting that the difference in warming rates for the periods 1860-1880, 1910-40 and 1975-2009 is statistically insignificant. Jones even acceded that there has been no statistically-significant global warming since 1995; that in fact, global temperatures have been trending to the downside since January of 2002, although he denied the statistical significance of the -0.12C per decade decline.

COMMENTS : 

NZder ‘Climate Cheerleader’ Jim Salinger was his work buddie,  in his younger days and also implicated in the hacked email scam !

And also Micheal Mann is deep in this poo as well.

Birds of a feather !

Dont let the facts get in the way..

Source: Smith urges caution with UN report

…”Climate Change Issues Minister Nick Smith has warned New Zealand scientists to take extra care when writing the next United Nations climate change summary to avoid slip-ups like those that have embarrassed their contemporaries overseas.”…

COMMENTS: Are you kidding me ‘slip ups’, more like a monumental f**k up’s of distorting the facts to get one’s desired political results. Nothing will change Nick Smith mind, he has his blinkers on. He does not want to ‘lose face’ and admit climate change is not man made and that there is little man can do to stop it good or bad.

If this was your heart surgeon..

Source: Scientist defends climate report despite slip-ups

…”A report by the United Nations’ expert panel on climate change, which is under fire for the sourcing of its information, has been defended by a New Zealand scientist who contributed.

A claim by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that global warming was melting glaciers in the European Alps, the Andes and Africa was based on a student dissertation and a climbing magazine article, not scientific journal papers, the London Sunday Telegraph said.

Dr Salinger defended the report, saying: “You’ll find that a huge part of the volume is there and just because there’s one or two slip-ups, that doesn’t negate the whole of the article.”….

COMMENTS: Sorry science does not do 1+4  = 6.. If you heart surgeon was this wrong would you go under the knife. Or worse pay huge taxes for falsehoods…